wait that makes too much sense and/or no sense at all. I now suspect that a dot above an operator means "lift this operator pointwise"
I forgot to mention that the paper is written in a highly abbreviated Haskell/math hybrid because they wanted to use the state monad in their metatheory lol. This is notational performance art and I am HERE for it
I'm too PL syntax brained-- I was looking for what the weird circle operator was but I think it might just be function composition 🤦♀️
this is what happens when you have triangles and diamonds everywhere smdh
Also mentally counting my burnt soup as "smoked"
Today's a big day for cognitive dissonance in the de Medeiros basement
I'm like, also vaguely trying to come up with any other measures I can use to differentiate groups A and B, because I got really great vibes from both. So
C) those are both fine and you should think about X instead
is also acceptable.
help me I've forgortten a word
Sometimes terms are well-typed because only well-typable terms are representable in some data structrure. Other times, ill-typed terms can be represented in the data structure but they never show up, either by a definition or because it's the output of some other compiler pass which preserves well-typedness.
what's the word delineating these two cases??? Is there a word???
Human in the loop automated formal verifier
I enjoy torturing my followers with rust memes and half-understood category theory
Undergrad@UBC (SPL); Markus de Medeiros (he/him) irl